Author

  • Andy Lyman is an editor at nm.news.
    He oversees teams reporting on state and local government. Andy served in newsrooms at KUNM, NM Political Report, SF Reporter and The Paper. before joining nm.news in 2023.

    View more stories

Amid passionate public objections to a proposal to put more pressure on vacant property owners and ban sitting or lying on sidewalks in Downtown Albuquerque, city councilors voted down the bill almost unanimously Monday night. 

After a long debate and a handful of amendments, councilors voted against the proposed Downtown Vacant Buildings and Properties Ordinance โ€” save for the billโ€™s sponsor, Councilor Joaquรญn Baca. 

YES: Joaquรญn Baca

NO: Brook Bassan, Dan Champine, Tammy Fiebelkorn, Renรฉe Grout, Dan Lewis,Klarissa Peรฑa, Nichole Rogers, Louie Sanchez

Mama Zeigh, a resident who frequently voices her opinions during council meetings, was among those who spoke against the legislation and singled out Baca. 

โ€œI am the only representative of Downtownโ€™s homeless community here,โ€ Zeigh said, while pointing at Baca. โ€œHow dare you tell a Mexican woman, who was born Downtown, where to sit, stand, kneel, how to think, what to believe. Are you kidding me?โ€ 

The ordinance would have implemented โ€œno obstruction zones,โ€ preventing people from โ€œsleeping, sitting, kneeling, crouching or lying downโ€ on Downtown sidewalks. It would have also required annual maintenance licenses, property inspections and vacancy registration fees for owners of vacant properties.

Read more about the ordinance here

Jackie Davis, another avid public commenter and University of New Mexico student, told councilors she is โ€œthe biggest pedestrian advocate you can find, I donโ€™t like when the sidewalk is obstructed,โ€ and presented a photo of a traffic sign in the middle of a sidewalk Downtown. 

โ€œIt brings the question of who is doing the obstructing of the sidewalk,โ€ Davis said. โ€œItโ€™s the city of Albuquerque posting โ€˜road work aheadโ€™ signs on the sidewalk. This ordinance seems misdirected at our unhoused neighbors as opposed to the actual obstruction pedestrians are facing on a daily basis.โ€ 

Davis said it would be a โ€œbad use of resourcesโ€ to require the cityโ€™s police officers to cite people for sleeping on sidewalks when they are โ€œso overburdened that they canโ€™t respond to a broken window or barely enforce traffic laws.โ€

Read more about how Davis got city officialsโ€™ attention over pedestrian safety by persistently speaking at council meetings here.

However, some speakers were in favor of certain parts of the legislation.

Jordon McConnell, a representative for Strong Towns ABQ, said addressing vacant and blighted properties would make Downtown โ€œsafer, more welcoming and better,โ€ but urged councilors to have more โ€œthoughtful amendments.โ€ 

 โ€œOur members believe this bill is a good step for revitalizing Downtown and ensuring a brighter future for the entire city,โ€ McConnell said. โ€œWe would like to see a more compassionate approach that focuses on housing and support services rather than fines.โ€ 

Councilor Tammy Fiebelkorn had similar thoughts and said the legislation had โ€œreally great ideasโ€ that she supports and hopes to bring it back without the sidewalk provision, which she said is โ€œincredibly problematic for the citizens of Albuquerque.โ€

Before councilors voted against the proposed ordinance, Baca said the bill was a โ€œgood-faith effortโ€ to address some long-standing issues. 

โ€œItโ€™s not perfect by any means, but it is a first step,โ€ Baca said. โ€œIโ€™m very much committed to making adjustments and changes as we move forward.โ€ 

Andy Lyman is an editor at nm.news. He oversees teams reporting on state and local government. Andy served in newsrooms at KUNM, NM Political Report, SF Reporter and The Paper. before joining nm.news...

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply